A Lead Score Model

1. Background Information

Following a recent Home Screen Revamp, Porter—a product-based logistics startup—observed a significant 33.23% increase in leads within its Householding vertical. This surge in expressions of interest created a vital opportunity for the organization to refine its lead management processes.

To capitalize on this growth, the company initiated the development of a Lead Score Model (LSM); a systematic approach designed to rank potential customers based on their specific likelihood of converting into paying customers.

2. Problem Statement

The primary challenge facing the organization is the high Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) driven by inefficient lead prioritization. Currently, Lead Management System (LMS) costs account for 4.5% of total revenue.

There is a critical business need to distinguish between high-intent and low-intent leads to prevent unnecessary outreach efforts. By failing to accurately predict lead conversion probability, the sales and marketing teams risk over-allocating resources to low-probability prospects, thereby inflating marginal costs and reducing overall profitability.

3. Solutions

To address these inefficiencies, the consultancy proposed a two-phased implementation of a predictive scoring framework aimed at reducing marginal costs from 4.5% to a target of 3.1% of revenue.

A. Component Framework & Scoring Mechanism:

• Data Integration: The model aggregates demographic info, behavioral data (e.g., website visits), firmographic data (e.g., industry), and previous transactional history.
• Scoring Logic: Points are assigned based on engagement value; for example, visiting a pricing page yields a higher score than a blog visit.

4. Implementation Phases

B. Phase 0: Rule-Based Implementation

The initial rollout utilizes predefined logic to establish immediate efficiency. By setting Score Thresholds, the system segments leads into high, medium, and low-intent categories. This allows the sales team to prioritize high-intent leads for personalized outreach while relegating low-scoring leads to automated nurturing, immediately reducing unnecessary call volume.

C. Phase 1: Machine Learning Development

The final solution involves transitioning to a Predictive Scoring Model using supervised machine learning, enabling dynamic lead scoring that continuously improves based on historical conversion data.

← Back to Case Studies